Forward induction reasoning revisited
نویسندگان
چکیده
Battigalli and Siniscalchi (2002) formalize the idea of forward induction reasoning as “rationality and common strong belief of rationality” (RCSBR). Here we study the behavioral implications of RCSBR across all type structures. Formally, we show that RCSBR is characterized by a solution concept we call extensive form best response sets (EFBRS’s). It turns out that the EFBRS concept is equivalent to a concept already proposed in the literature, namely directed rationalizability (Battigalli and Siniscalchi 2003). We conclude by applying the EFBRS concept to games of interest.
منابع مشابه
Backward Induction versus Forward Induction Reasoning
In this paper we want to shed some light on what we mean by backward induction and forward induction reasoning in dynamic games. To that purpose, we take the concepts of common belief in future rationality (Perea, 2010) and extensive form rationalizability (Pearce, 1984; Battigalli, 1997; Battigalli, Siniscalchi, 2002) as possible representatives for backward induction and forward induction rea...
متن کاملBackwards Induction versus Forward Induction Reasoning
In this paper we want to shed some further light on what we mean by backwards induction and forward induction reasoning in dynamic games. To that purpose, we take the concepts of common belief in future rationality (Perea (2010)) and extensive form rationalizability (Pearce (1984), Battigalli (1997), Battigalli and Siniscalchi (2002)) as possible representatives for backwards induction and forw...
متن کاملForward induction reasoning and correct beliefs
All equilibrium concepts implicitly make a correct beliefs assumption, stating that a player believes that his opponents are correct about his first-order beliefs. In this paper we show that in many dynamic games of interest, this correct beliefs assumption may be incompatible with a very basic form of forward induction reasoning: the first two layers of extensive-form rationalizability (Pearce...
متن کاملBackward Induction or Forward Reasoning? - an Experiment of stochastic Alternating offer bargaining
Bounded rationality questions backward induction, which however, does not exclude such reasoning when anticipation is easy. In our stochastic (alternating offer) bargaining experiment, there is a certain first-period pie and a known finite deadline. What is uncertain (except for the final period) is whether there is a further period. Whereas backward induction requires information about all lat...
متن کاملThe E-Mail Game Revisited - Modeling Rough Inductive Reasoning
I study the robustness of Rubinstein’s (1989) E-Mail Game results towards rough inductive reasoning. Rough induction is a form of boundedly rational reasoning where a player does not carry out every
متن کامل